| Author |
Message |
 | Dan W | | Registered: May 9, 2002 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 980 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting 8ballMax: Quote:
Quoting Kulju:
Quote:
It is not called digipack, it's called digipak.
You say Tomayto, I say Tomahto  Bla, bla bla. | | | | Dan |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Rifter: Quote:
Method One Method Two
BOXSET (Movie or TV) Alternate Method:
Add a checkbox to indicate [] Boxset
Keepcases w/S.cover Then pick approp. case type
Keepcases w/Sleeve Keepcases w/S.cover
Digipack w/S.cover Keepcases w/Sleeve
Digipack w/Sleeve Digipack w/S.cover
Custom Digipack w/Sleeve
Keepcase
SINGLE TITLE Thinpack
Digipack
Keepcase w/S.cover Custom
Keepcase w/Sleeve
Keepcase
Digipack
Thinpack
Custom
If I'm reading this right, you're suggesting that just adding "slip case" to case types is too generic, and we actually need more, more specific entries? If that's the case, then I like that idea a lot. I think you'd also need Thinpaks with slipcovers in the box set list. And to answer your question, a Steelbook is a single type case (basically it's a keepcase made out of metal). |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 2,694 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote:
Quoting Rifter:
Quote:
Method One Method Two
BOXSET (Movie or TV) Alternate Method:
Add a checkbox to indicate [] Boxset
Keepcases w/S.cover Then pick approp. case type
Keepcases w/Sleeve Keepcases w/S.cover
Digipack w/S.cover Keepcases w/Sleeve
Digipack w/Sleeve Digipack w/S.cover
Custom Digipack w/Sleeve
Keepcase
SINGLE TITLE Thinpack
Digipack
Keepcase w/S.cover Custom
Keepcase w/Sleeve
Keepcase
Digipack
Thinpack
Custom
If I'm reading this right, you're suggesting that just adding "slip case" to case types is too generic, and we actually need more, more specific entries? If that's the case, then I like that idea a lot.
I think you'd also need Thinpaks with slipcovers in the box set list. And to answer your question, a Steelbook is a single type case (basically it's a keepcase made out of metal). Like I said, this was a first draft, and if any are missing add them in. | | | John
"Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice!" Senator Barry Goldwater, 1964
Make America Great Again! |
|
| Dan W | | Registered: May 9, 2002 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 980 |
| | Posted: | | | | A checkbox would make this a great deal easier. | | | | Dan |
|
| Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 6,014 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dan W: Quote:
A checkbox would make this a great deal easier. I agree. I wonder if adding a CHECKBOX to indicate if there's a slipcase or not, as T!M has suggested elsewhere, would not resolve much (if not all) of the ongoing disputes here. The dropdown menu can then be reserved for what some call the "inner" packaging. |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | The problem with moving the slip cover info to a checkbox is, what do we use for case type for parent profiles of box sets? |
|
| Registered: March 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,014 |
| | Posted: | | | | I do see your point.
Just a thought: why not call it what it really is (physically, I mean): if it's a cardboard box, call it a cardboard box. If it's a fat keep case, call it keep case. If it's a digipak, call it digipak etc.
Trying to find a constructive solution - I have no intention of entering the arena of nitpicking here. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 3,432 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote:
The problem with moving the slip cover info to a checkbox is, what do we use for case type for parent profiles of box sets? In my opinion that's is where you would use the checkbox. You would not use it for the child profiles. Quoting dee1959jay: Quote:
Just a thought: why not call it what it really is (physically, I mean): if it's a cardboard box, call it a cardboard box. If it's a fat keep case, call it keep case. If it's a digipak, call it digipak etc. I was trying to say that on the first couple of pages of these threads. But it's not what the majority wants... | | | Achim [諾亞信； Ya-Shin//Nuo], a German in Taiwan.
Registered: May 29, 2000 (at InterVocative) | | | | Last edited: by nuoyaxin |
|
| Dan W | | Registered: May 9, 2002 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 980 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting ya_shin: Quote:
Quoting dee1959jay:
Quote:
Just a thought: why not call it what it really is (physically, I mean): if it's a cardboard box, call it a cardboard box. If it's a fat keep case, call it keep case. If it's a digipak, call it digipak etc.
I was trying to say that on the first couple of pages of these threads. But it's not what the majority wants... Achim, you know all too well that making things simple and accurate just doesn't wash with this group. Or so it would seem. | | | | Dan |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote:
The problem with moving the slip cover info to a checkbox is, what do we use for case type for parent profiles of box sets? Use the "inner" child case type. You will then know that it has children in a specific case type, enclosed in a slip case. Alternately, make case type optional...then you could leave it blank and just tick the "Slip Case" checkbox. | | | | Hal | | | | Last edited: by hal9g |
|