| Message |
Details |
I forgot that the features listed on both are different so I change my initial comment and concur that this should be an alternate version.
However, that reminded me that some of the earlier copies also had a back cover that listed all features, but the disc didn't contain those features. | Posted: Topic Replies: 5, Topic Views: 4975 |
 |
From my perspective, this is no different than other replacement discs so I'd say the disc ID should be overwritten on the original profile. Technically, DVDP stores both for profile lookup.
If it was a complete reissue with a different UPC then I'd say it should be an alternate profile. | Posted: Topic Replies: 5, Topic Views: 4975 |
|
In this case, I'd have to agree with the other poster based on my initial research. Here's the link to the company's registration in the UK.
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/SC406063
In Britain, Ltd. or Limited after the company name implies it's a private limited company which means it's a limited company (have limited liability). This aligns with what is shown in the link above, where the company is a private limited company and they have the Limited after the name. | Posted: Topic Replies: 6, Topic Views: 6090 |
|
Quoting Voltaire53:
Quote:
No Votes always have to state a reason why the person is voting no and you should be able to see this
Sure, doesn't mean they're always useful. Sometimes they just state that they prefer the current image. | Posted: Topic Replies: 10, Topic Views: 8164 |
|
| Have you tried setting the network setting to bridge networking in VMware Fusion? | Posted: Topic Replies: 29, Topic Views: 14408 |
|
| Both have been used in the credit block of the back covers. You should use what is listed in the credit block just like we use whatever is listed for the studio in the film credits. | Posted: Topic Replies: 5, Topic Views: 5458 |
|
| Are they categorized as Owned, Ordered, or Wishlist? | Posted: Topic Replies: 4, Topic Views: 5530 |
|
Quoting huskersports:
Quote:
Not true. For instance, I created a new profile of the Tommy Boy BD child profile that was part of the 4K/BD steelbook. Before I contributed it, I right-clicked on the "View Contributors" tab (next to "Loan Status") and saw that primtime21 had already created an initial contribution for it, but it had not been approved yet. So I had to wait with my update until that initial contribution had been approved.
Ah, I see what you mean. I was thinking when you click on the View Contributors icon it brings up the window, but the View Contribution Notes link is missing on that window until the new profile is approved and released. | Posted: Topic Replies: 7, Topic Views: 6548 |
|
Quoting huskersports:
Quote:
Then, before I do ANYTHING else, I will right-click on the "View Contributors" tab and click on "View Contribution Notes" to see if an initial contribution has already been done.
I'm pretty sure that only works if a new profile has alrady been accepted and released, but not if it's still pending approval. | Posted: Topic Replies: 7, Topic Views: 6548 |
|
If you have the UPC you can append it to this link and you can see if a brand new profile is pending approval. Of course, you won't be able to see the details until it is approved.
http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=contributionnotes&type=DVD&ProfileUPC= | Posted: Topic Replies: 7, Topic Views: 6548 |
|
| You should list it as a UK locality. | Posted: Topic Replies: 1, Topic Views: 2448 |
|
| The custom backup shows 9 main things to backup, one of which is for cover scans. 8/9 is 88.88% so it's possible it's based on that. | Posted: Topic Replies: 9, Topic Views: 9087 |
|
Maybe check to see what plug-ins you have installed and disable them. You could try adding them back one by one to see if a particular plug-in is causing issues.
DVDP loads faster for me on Win11. | Posted: Topic Replies: 2, Topic Views: 3758 |
|
Quoting ObiKen:
Quote:
This is my understanding:
• Kino Lorber Studio Classics (aka KL Studio Classics) is not a valid company name, it is a physical media label used by Kino Lorber, which focusses on Hollywood classics. Refer "Our Story" section (2nd and 4th paragraphs): https://kinolorber.com/about
KLSC is similar to The Criterion Collection's Eclipse label except they focus on the most popular hollywood classics for home video.
Quoting ObiKen:
Quote:
• DVD package design (which includes graphic design) is a publishing function, as it covers package construction, artwork, typography. Even "The Criterion Collection" has on their back covers a "package copyright author (media release year)", confirming their publisher role. Kino Lorber made no such claim on the packaging.
The studios aren't publishing these titles though they retain the copyrights to any artwork created. Even if a label pays for a 4K restoration, the copyright holder maintains the rights to that new work. However, KLSC is the one that is publishing this new media, not the studio. KL is the one assemblying, paying for, and putting together this release and therefore publishing this specific release.
Some labels don't include a statement such as "under exclusive license from..." or "licensed from..." but that doesn't mean there is no licensor.
Quoting ObiKen:
Quote:
• The "Paramount Pictures" logo was on the back cover.
The Paramount Pictures logo is on the back cover because they are the studio and copyright holder of the film. It's quite common to include the logos of the studios and production companies on the back artwork regardless as to who is publishing the media. In this case Paramount Pictures is both the production company and the theatrical release studio.
Quoting ObiKen:
Quote:
• The restored 3D/2D film was not a derivative work of the original film, so Kino Lorber (or 3-D Film Archive) cannot claim ownership (copyright) of the restoration work, but is licensed to distribute the restoration work.
Agree. KL is the distributor of this media release. | Posted: Topic Replies: 7, Topic Views: 7651 |
|
Quoting scotthm:
Quote:
I believe they do film preservation, but I don't think they're a licensor or publisher. You can read a bit about their work here.
---------------
Agree. 3-D Film Archive focuses on film preservation of 3-D films and partners with other publishers to release those restorations on media. | Posted: Topic Replies: 7, Topic Views: 7651 |
|
Quoting ObiKen:
Quote:
The fine print at the bottom of the back cover displayed:
DISTRIBUTED AND MARKETED BY KINO LORBER INC. UNDER EXCLUSIVE LICENSE FROM PARAMOUNT HOME ENTERTAINMENT INC. PACKAGE DESIGN © 2023 PARAMOUNT PICTURES.
Media companies: Paramount Pictures (publisher), Paramount Home Entertainment (licensor) and Kino Lorber (distributor).
I inferred that Kino Lorber commissioned the 3D/2D restoration (by 3-D Film Archive) for the release.
"3-D Film Archive LLC" may act as a media company when it owns the film (such as, The Stewardesses, 3-D Rarities).
Hope that helped.
Disagree. Paramount Pictures isn't the publisher in this case and Paramount is only a licensor. It's Kino that is doing the publishing.
Kino Lorber Studio Classics (publisher), Paramount Home Entertainment (licensor) and Kino Lorber (distributor). | Posted: Topic Replies: 7, Topic Views: 7651 |
|