Author |
Message |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,685 |
| Posted: | | | | Is is Tower of Terror/Haunted Mansion/Mr. Toad's Wild Ride/The Country Bears ? Or is it Disney Thrills and Chillls ? Or something else? And what - if anything - is the edition? | | | My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users. Gunnar |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | I would use...
Title: Disney Thrills and Chillls Edition: Empty
Since we use title of the set for box sets. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: March 23, 2011 | Posts: 462 |
| Posted: | | | | Title: Disney Thrills and Chillls: 4-Movie Collection Edition: Empty | | | Last edited: by No-way |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | I don't see 4-Movie Collection being part of the title. To be honest didn't even notice it there until now. But if anything at all it would belong in the edition field. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | I half agree with Pete. Where I differ is with the empty edition field. The rule for that field says, "The Edition field is for distinguishing between DVDs, and for indicating special versions and collections." To me, 4-Movie Collection qualifies as a collections so would be a valid edition. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | As I said above (sure you missed it)... I missed that collection above earlier... so I agree with you Martian. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: March 23, 2011 | Posts: 462 |
| Posted: | | | | Ok. Are there other similar DVD's that it has to be distinguished from ? |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | Per rules it don't have to distinguish from. That is only ONE of the uses of the edition field. The field has 3 uses...
- Distinguishing between versions - Indicating Collections - Indicating Special Versions
And even if you don't feel it fits in any of those three (which could be argued).... don't make it part of the title. Either way it is not part of the title of the set. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: March 23, 2011 | Posts: 462 |
| Posted: | | | | "The Edition field is for distinguishing between DVDs, and for indicating special versions and collections." There is an "and" there, so both conditions must apply. Not one or the other. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote: As I said above (sure you missed it)... I missed that collection above earlier... so I agree with you Martian. Yea, it seems you posted as I was typing and I missed your second post. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | Not necessarily... it is saying the field can be for this and and the field can be for that. I know this is the way we have been doing it (with those exact rules) for as long as I remember.
But once again.. I still have to say there is no way it would be part of the title whether it is believed to be part of the edition or not. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: March 23, 2011 | Posts: 462 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote: it is saying the field can be for this and and the field can be for that. Exactly. It doesn't say the field can be for this or the field can be for that. It says it has to be for this AND that. Both. I have no personal interest in this. I'm just quoting the rules. And the rules also say: "If you are using a non-standard description, take it from the DVD box, and ensure it will help distinguish between different releases of the same title." If it should be part of the title field or not ? I think we both are right. "(Use the title from the front cover.") It's on the front cover. | | | Last edited: by No-way |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | It says use the TITLE from the front cover... that is in a banner above everything... it is in no way part of the title. It is not even near the title to be part of it. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: March 23, 2011 | Posts: 462 |
| Posted: | | | | Ok. I don't care. GSyren asked for opinions. I have posted mine. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | Also "and" can be used 2 different ways... it could mean (like you are talking about) and all of it has to be checked off the list to use... or it could mean that there is a list of different times the field can be used... not all of them but any of them.
There is many releases that the only release has "The Whatever Edition" and it is the only version out. Going by the way you are thinking we wouldn't be able to capture the edition because it is the only release.
That is not what is meant here. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 71 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting TheMadMartian: Quote: I half agree with Pete. Where I differ is with the empty edition field. The rule for that field says, "The Edition field is for distinguishing between DVDs, and for indicating special versions and collections." To me, 4-Movie Collection qualifies as a collections so would be a valid edition. This Title: Disney Thrills and Chills Edition: 4-Movie Collection | | | Last edited: by DigitalGhost |
|