|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4 Previous Next
|
. |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 302 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: Quoting madacid:
Quote: maybe you misunderstand me guess. If there is "Antony Wong" in the credits it should be entered so.
actor: Chau Sang Anthony Wong [credited as Anthony Wong]
No, I understood you perfectly. What you are suggesting is against the rules. We don't deal with 'real' names. We deal with 'credited' names. Rules said: "Use the "Credited As" field where the person's name differs from the credited name." In this case. His name is "Anthony Wong Chau Sang" and he is "credited as" "Anthony Wong" | | | regards, Mad -
My HD-Media, DVDs, Laserdiscs | | | Last edited: by madacid |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 302 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Forget_the_Rest: Quote: That may be how they write them, but Chow is still the first name so should be entered in that field, etc... But First Middle Last Name only makes sense in an occidental dimension. | | | regards, Mad -
My HD-Media, DVDs, Laserdiscs |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting madacid: Quote:
Rules said: "Use the "Credited As" field where the person's name differs from the credited name."
In this case. His name is "Anthony Wong Chau Sang" and he is "credited as" "Anthony Wong" And 'John Wayne's' name is 'Marion Morrison'. Should we use credited as there as well? How about Cedric the Entertainer or Charles Bronson or any number of actors that don't use their real names? All of that is moot, however, as Ken has already addressed this issue. I don't have the time to find the thread right now, so I will have to go from memory. Ken said we are not after the 'real' name, we are after the most credited form of the name. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Mad:
You are barking up the wrong tree. This database is built around Film credits and the way in which they are displayed On Screen, without regard to any cultural issues OR "REAL" name issues. If there is an issue with culture then you should address the problem with the actors and the film industry. there is no difference in profiler between John Wayne and Chow Yun-Fat. Cultural issues are simply a poltically correct smokescreen. That has no place in the way we deal with the data, you are of course free to do whatever you wish locally but that is an entirely different issue from the Online and the Contribution system.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 302 |
| Posted: | | | | if this database is only about "credits displayed on screen" we just need the "as credited"-field and no "first-, middle-, lastname" or "birthyear" at all. The existence of theese fields shows, that we try to identify the persons. And if it helps to identify chinese actors by collecting their cantonese/madarin forename as well (and these names are commonly used/written in asian movie credits but maybe the western majority is unable to read them) we should do that.
a simple example. what gives more usefull information?
"Tony Leung Chiu Wai" "Tony Leung Ka Fai" "Tony Leung Siu Hung" "Tony Leung Hung Wah"
or
Tony Leung(1962) Tony Leung(1958) Tony Leung() Tony Leung() | | | regards, Mad -
My HD-Media, DVDs, Laserdiscs | | | Last edited: by madacid |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting madacid: Quote: if this database is only about "credits displayed on screen" we just need the "as credited"-field and no "first-, middle-, lastname" or "birthyear" at all. The existence of theese fields shows, that we try to identify the persons. And if it helps to identify chinese actors by collecting their cantonese/madarin forename as well (and these names are commonly used/written in asian movie credits but maybe the western majority is unable to read them) we should do that. Yes, we want to identify the person but we do so by using the credits. Since you don't want to believe any of us, maybe you will believe Ken. From this post: "The common name is not intended to always reflect the "real name", but the most commonly credited name." I hope that puts an end to this debate. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,738 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: I hope that puts an end to this debate. From frequent experience I can assure you that it won't. Like all others before it, this thread too will fall out of sight in a few days' time, and the next user that comes along (including those that don't ever visit the forums at all) still doesn't know anything about it and only has the rules to rely on, telling him to use the "Credited As" field where the person's name differs from the credited name - without defining "the person's name". Madacid is not to blame here - how could he be expected to know about this? Since the "most-credited form" is the very essence of how we enter names, a post by Ken in some old forum-thread is not enough: this really needs to be added to the rules - along with quote a few other clarifications. It's good that you managed to find back that post, though, I've bookmarked it now so I can easily refer to it the next time. | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 767 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting madacid: Quote: Quoting Forget_the_Rest:
Quote: That may be how they write them, but Chow is still the first name so should be entered in that field, etc... But First Middle Last Name only makes sense in an occidental dimension. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,759 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Forget_the_Rest: Quote: That may be how they write them, but Chow is still the first name so should be entered in that field, etc... No, it's still a family name aka last name. We only put "Chow" into the first name field, if it is used as a given name or given name part of a stage name. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 302 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting RHo: Quote: Quoting Forget_the_Rest:
Quote: That may be how they write them, but Chow is still the first name so should be entered in that field, etc... No, it's still a family name aka last name. We only put "Chow" into the first name field, if it is used as a given name or given name part of a stage name. It comes and goes how Ken wants to getting understand the "first- middle- lastname" fields in his program. If (and thats the most logical understanding) he wants to catch: First Name = Forename(s) Middle Name = Forename(s)/Stage-/Nickname Lastname = Familyname then the credit "Chow Yun Fat" has to enter as "Yun Fat" "" "Chow" if it should just be an order of name-parts be should catch him as: "Chow" "Yun" "Fat" but then to be consequent it also should be: "Helena" "Bonham" Carter" but we also have to cheat, if there are more than 3 name-parts... Maybe there are millions of posts of discussion about catching persons' name right.. but they didn't fix the "oriental name problem", yet. The existing rules are only usefull für western-movies (= US movies) | | | regards, Mad -
My HD-Media, DVDs, Laserdiscs |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Mad:
What do you NOT comprehend about one simple phrase in the Rules.
"names and roles listed exactly as they are in the credits and in exactly the same order credited."
You are clearly among those that are not happy with this and wish to be able to apply your preference to it. but the Rule means EXACTLY what it says PERIOD, no cultural biases are any thing else, exactly As it is displayed On Screen. Whay you consider a cheat isimply because we cannot account for each and every possibility. You are FREE to do whatever you wish within the confines of your LOCAL database. Byut the rules mean they say, and no amount of rationalization by you or anyone else will change that. We are matching the film's ON SCREEN credits. PERIOD.
You can continue with your incorrect interpretation but the Rules do not and will not support you. You are applying what you believe is meant with First Name = Forename(s) Middle Name = Forename(s)/Stage-/Nickname Lastname = Familyname
But there is no basis in fact for that. the Rules tell you what to do and how to do it. And the terms we use are simple terms First name Middle name Last Name There is absolutely nothing within the system, the Rules or anything that you have been told by myself and others that would lead to ANY other conclkusion. Your conclusion is based upon your personal interpretation which is unsupportable in the Rules, therefore it belongs locally ONLY.
I understand what you want and why you want it, and there is a place for it in your local, you have to recognize what we are trying to achieve in the online and WHY.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 302 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Mad:
What do you NOT comprehend about one simple phrase in the Rules.
"names and roles listed exactly as they are in the credits and in exactly the same order credited."
You are clearly among those that are not happy with this and wish to be able to apply your preference to it. but the Rule means EXACTLY what it says PERIOD, no cultural biases are any thing else, exactly As it is displayed On Screen. Whay you consider a cheat isimply because we cannot account for each and every possibility. You are FREE to do whatever you wish within the confines of your LOCAL database. Byut the rules mean they say, and no amount of rationalization by you or anyone else will change that. We are matching the film's ON SCREEN credits. PERIOD. And IMHO a follow this rules by using the "as credited"-field. Unfortunately there is no real example but lets say there is a movie with the following credits: Pacino Al DeNiro Robert Bonham Carter Helena how would you enter these names into the database? The same way we should handle the asian movies. Then because most of us are unable to read mandarin/kanthonese/japanese or any other foreign language, we shouldn't be such ignorant and so creating wrong data Quote: You can continue with your incorrect interpretation but the Rules do not and will not support you. You are applying what you believe is meant with First Name = Forename(s) Middle Name = Forename(s)/Stage-/Nickname Lastname = Familyname
But there is no basis in fact for that. the Rules tell you what to do and how to do it. And the terms we use are simple terms First name Middle name Last Name There is absolutely nothing within the system, the Rules or anything that you have been told by myself and others that would lead to ANY other conclkusion. Your conclusion is based upon your personal interpretation which is unsupportable in the Rules, therefore it belongs locally ONLY.
I understand what you want and why you want it, and there is a place for it in your local, you have to recognize what we are trying to achieve in the online and WHY.
Skip please explain me, what's the deal of seperating an actor's name into 3 sections, if the sections doesn't mean anything? I only wanna know: what was the intention of the inventer of these 3 fields? (maybe only Ken can tell this) Why he didn't call the fields "name1" "name2" "name3", because he had another intention. In the western hemispere "First Middle Lastname" has a speficic meaning and in the most cases we don't have to check it, bacasue of the same origin. But in lots of eastern countries is has other origins of sorting names. Even in some bavarian parts it's common to sort his name "unusual" Lastname/Firstname. So it's not only an asian issue. Regards Mad | | | regards, Mad -
My HD-Media, DVDs, Laserdiscs |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 374 |
| Posted: | | | | Mad,
this has been discussed numerous times without any solution. There is even a related thread pinned here.
Your points are IMHO valid but until Ken clarifies this we should leave it alone.
Regards Sugar |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting sugarjoe: Quote: Mad,
this has been discussed numerous times without any solution. There is even a related thread pinned here.
Your points are IMHO valid but until Ken clarifies this we should leave it alone.
Regards Sugar What he said. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | As you've seen Madacid, there are users who understand the problem but who have conflicting ideas about how to go about a solution, and there are users who blindly refuse to even see the problem. I've contacted Invelos asking for advice about this situation. Hopefully we'll get an answer. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting madacid: Quote: Quoting skipnet50:
Quote: Mad:
What do you NOT comprehend about one simple phrase in the Rules.
"names and roles listed exactly as they are in the credits and in exactly the same order credited."
You are clearly among those that are not happy with this and wish to be able to apply your preference to it. but the Rule means EXACTLY what it says PERIOD, no cultural biases are any thing else, exactly As it is displayed On Screen. Whay you consider a cheat isimply because we cannot account for each and every possibility. You are FREE to do whatever you wish within the confines of your LOCAL database. Byut the rules mean they say, and no amount of rationalization by you or anyone else will change that. We are matching the film's ON SCREEN credits. PERIOD. And IMHO a follow this rules by using the "as credited"-field. Unfortunately there is no real example but lets say there is a movie with the following credits:
Pacino Al DeNiro Robert Bonham Carter Helena
how would you enter these names into the database? The same way we should handle the asian movies. Then because most of us are unable to read mandarin/kanthonese/japanese or any other foreign language, we shouldn't be such ignorant and so creating wrong data
Quote: You can continue with your incorrect interpretation but the Rules do not and will not support you. You are applying what you believe is meant with First Name = Forename(s) Middle Name = Forename(s)/Stage-/Nickname Lastname = Familyname
But there is no basis in fact for that. the Rules tell you what to do and how to do it. And the terms we use are simple terms First name Middle name Last Name There is absolutely nothing within the system, the Rules or anything that you have been told by myself and others that would lead to ANY other conclkusion. Your conclusion is based upon your personal interpretation which is unsupportable in the Rules, therefore it belongs locally ONLY.
I understand what you want and why you want it, and there is a place for it in your local, you have to recognize what we are trying to achieve in the online and WHY.
Skip please explain me, what's the deal of seperating an actor's name into 3 sections, if the sections doesn't mean anything? I only wanna know: what was the intention of the inventer of these 3 fields? (maybe only Ken can tell this) Why he didn't call the fields "name1" "name2" "name3", because he had another intention. In the western hemispere "First Middle Lastname" has a speficic meaning and in the most cases we don't have to check it, bacasue of the same origin. But in lots of eastern countries is has other origins of sorting names. Even in some bavarian parts it's common to sort his name "unusual" Lastname/Firstname. So it's not only an asian issue.
Regards Mad Unlike what north said there is no conflict. Mad, there is a meaning just NOT the meaning you are trying to put to them First Middle Last are the ONLY words used and there is no further definition(other than the one you are TRYING to apply). The Rules clearly state what to do with the data, and that in turn defines the fields as FIRST, MIDDLE, LAST. You are trying to apply meaning to the fields that suits YOU but is not supported by the Rules or the program. In short you are making assumptions about what is meant, and you have been told that assumption is not correct and not merely by myself.. As for use of the CLT, we have all repeatedly been told that we are not after "Correct" names, but after most COMMONLY credited names. So yet again that would be misuse of the program data for Contribution, this is data which can easily and should be accomodated LOCALLY. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|