Author |
Message |
Registered: December 27, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,131 |
| Posted: | | | | If you're not open to learning why do you ask questions?
I have learned, that you follow the majority decision from a poll or thread and then in a year or 2 people flip-flop and stick in your face. So I follow the rules the way I see them now. |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,852 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting ateo357: Quote: the only requirement is that the crew role is listed in the crew credit grid, which it is as Visual Effects. But in CharlieM's example above ("Visual Effects by ABC") that's a company credit, not an individual credit. --------------- |
|
Registered: December 27, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,131 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: Quoting ateo357:
Quote: the only requirement is that the crew role is listed in the crew credit grid, which it is as Visual Effects. But in CharlieM's example above ("Visual Effects by ABC") that's a company credit, not an individual credit.
--------------- And per the header - It is a group of names that are credited for VFX for that company. Now if they would've added a secondary crew role for each name that would be different, but the only credit I see is Visual Effects by. |
|
Registered: December 27, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,131 |
| Posted: | | | | let's make it easy for everyone. to be in the credit roll of a film you need a job discription. so what is the job discription for these 6 names?
Visual Effects by NEW DEAL STUDIOS IAN HUNTER DAVID SANGER TIMOTHY E. ANGULO RICHARD O. HELMER JOHN CAZIN SCOTT BEVERLY | | | Last edited: by ateo357 |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,852 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting ateo357: Quote: And per the header - It is a group of names that are credited for VFX for that company.
...the only credit I see is Visual Effects by. Immediately after the "by" do you see the name of a company or a person? A company. If you ignore the company credit do you see any credits for the crew? If not then they don't meet the " other listing requirements" required by the rules. --------------- |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,852 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting ateo357: Quote: let's make it easy for everyone. to be in the credit roll of a film you need a job discription. so what is the job discription for these 6 names?
Visual Effects by NEW DEAL STUDIOS IAN HUNTER DAVID SANGER TIMOTHY E. ANGULO RICHARD O. HELMER JOHN CAZIN SCOTT BEVERLY There is no job description, just a list of New Deal Studios employees. Ian Hunter was the supervisor, David, Timothy and Richard did SFX, John was the office manager and Scott swept the floors. --------------- |
|
Registered: December 27, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,131 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: Quoting ateo357:
Quote: let's make it easy for everyone. to be in the credit roll of a film you need a job discription. so what is the job discription for these 6 names?
Visual Effects by NEW DEAL STUDIOS IAN HUNTER DAVID SANGER TIMOTHY E. ANGULO RICHARD O. HELMER JOHN CAZIN SCOTT BEVERLY There is no job description, just a list of New Deal Studios employees. Ian Hunter was the supervisor, David, Timothy and Richard did SFX, John was the office manager and Scott swept the floors.
--------------- and you know that because you worked with Scott? |
|
Registered: May 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,934 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting ateo357: Quote: let's make it easy for everyone. to be in the credit roll of a film you need a job discription. so what is the job discription for these 6 names?
Visual Effects by NEW DEAL STUDIOS IAN HUNTER DAVID SANGER TIMOTHY E. ANGULO RICHARD O. HELMER JOHN CAZIN SCOTT BEVERLY Aside from what scotthm described, who knew. There could be a producer, a rotoscoper, cgi supervisor, modeling supervisor, miniature supervisor. There are literally dozens of different jobs that would be under a company header (just look at some of the ILM listings). The only thing we know with a company header, is that the company provided VFX. Without the crew roles assigned to each one, we have no idea what the individual jobs are. And as per the rules, they do not fit other listing requirements. |
|
Registered: May 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,934 |
| Posted: | | | | From a research
Ian Hunter Visual Effects Supervisor David Sanger Visual Effects Producer Timothy E. Angulo Miniature Director of Photography Richard O. Helmer Special Effects Supervisor (looks like a pyrotechnics specialist) John Cazin Special Effects Supervisor Scott Beverly Mechanical Effects Supervisor
What about the other 12 people under that header
Patrick Dunn-Baker Digital Set Designer Emily Kwong Digital Set Designer Jeffrey Jasper Digital Effects Supervisor Katie Linahon Production Coordinator Kevin McTurk Model maker Steve Newburn Key Model maker Kain Suwannaphin Visual Effects Artist
What About the others? | | | Last edited: by CharlieM |
|
Registered: March 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,750 |
| Posted: | | | | In reply to original post. It could be that they have no specific role because they do a bit of everything which would make their role to long to add. That would qualify them for the credit. | | | Marty - Registered July 10, 2004, User since 2002. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,819 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting CharlieM: Quote: From a research
Ian Hunter Visual Effects Supervisor David Sanger Visual Effects Producer Timothy E. Angulo Miniature Director of Photography Richard O. Helmer Special Effects Supervisor (looks like a pyrotechnics specialist) John Cazin Special Effects Supervisor Scott Beverly Mechanical Effects Supervisor
What about the other 12 people under that header
Patrick Dunn-Baker Digital Set Designer Emily Kwong Digital Set Designer Jeffrey Jasper Digital Effects Supervisor Katie Linahon Production Coordinator Kevin McTurk Model maker Steve Newburn Key Model maker Kain Suwannaphin Visual Effects Artist
What About the others? I'm possibly being dumb here - but everything above IS 'Visual Effects'. Everyone in this team was working towards creating the 'visual effects' for the film in question. Maybe the makers didn't feel they needed to list each job individually? Maybe they felt that the heading of 'Visual Effects by...' was enough to show what these people did? Either way, I would (and have - and will continue to do so) include these people. They are credited with working on the 'visual effects' for this movie. 'Visual Effects' is a valid entry according to the rules. So they should be included. Here's part of my reasoning: Songwriter. With the arguments the following could NOT be included (FICTIONAL example): "Suddenly" (header) Alain Boublil and Claude-Michel Schonberg Neither would: "Suddenly" (header) Music by Alain Boublil (INCLUDED) Lyrics by Claude-Michel Schonberg (NOT ALLOWED). Neither would THIS!: "Suddenly" (header) Music and Lyrcs by Alain Boublil and Claude-Michel Schonberg. If you follow the rules to the letter, THIS is the ONLY way to get this song into the crew list: Neither would: "Suddenly" (header) Songwriters: Alain Boublil and Claude-Michel Schonberg. This is because the only guideline we're given is that it's the 'original songwriters'. No roles are listed to determined what IS or isn't included. So, taken exactly as written, the only acceptable entry is someone credited with 'songwriter'. Obviously, that is not the intention of the rules. To leave a song out that was written exclusively for the film Les Miserables just because of job description would have been ridiculous. A little common sense is required in my opinion. This is an original song and the people listed under it are the writers of said song - therefore, they should get included. This is the logic I employ with all crew. If the 'divider' includes a job title then the people under that did that role (unless credited with a specific role). If the Company name includes Visual Effects (or whatever) and a list of people, then for ease of use, those people did that job. To make it more complicated seems counter-productive and unnecessarily complicated, in my opinion. | | | Last edited: by Pantheon |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,852 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting mreeder50: Quote: It could be that they have no specific role because they do a bit of everything which would make their role to long to add. That would qualify them for the credit. So now we should include people with no credited roles because they might have done something we credit? What ever happened to the idea of leaving out credits we're not sure about? It's one thing to want these in your local database but why do you feel the need to put contentious credits into the online database? --------------- |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,852 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Pantheon: Quote: Here's part of my reasoning:
Songwriter. With the arguments the following could NOT be included (FICTIONAL example): "Suddenly" (header) Alain Boublil and Claude-Michel Schonberg
Neither would: "Suddenly" (header) Music by Alain Boublil (INCLUDED) Lyrics by Claude-Michel Schonberg (NOT ALLOWED).
Neither would THIS!: "Suddenly" (header) Music and Lyrcs by Alain Boublil and Claude-Michel Schonberg.
If you follow the rules to the letter, THIS is the ONLY way to get this song into the crew list: Neither would: "Suddenly" (header) Songwriters: Alain Boublil and Claude-Michel Schonberg.
This is because the only guideline we're given is that it's the 'original songwriters'. No roles are listed to determined what IS or isn't included. So, taken exactly as written, the only acceptable entry is someone credited with 'songwriter'. Quite the contrary. The "Credited As" field in the crew table is blank for songwriters, so there is more leeway for what is allowed, not less. All we have to make sure of is that they wrote an "original song" for the film. The exact form of the credit is flexible. By the way, as an aside, using group headers for song titles is a terrible idea because group headers in the crew are only allowed to head "crew teams", and many songs are written by a single person. Thus we cannot currently both follow the rules and uniformly apply group headers to all song titles. --------------- |
|
Registered: May 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,475 |
| Posted: | | | | Based on how the credits are written and my understanding of the rules, I would credit those Crew members. |
|
Registered: October 30, 2011 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,870 |
| Posted: | | | | I think this actually has a lot to do with this thread http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=725071 Because it really boils down to do whether the company group header information is inherited by the crew within it. Many of us had the opinion that it did not so a company with a header of "Additional Visual Effects By" is able to be credited because "Additional" is not automatically assumed to be part of the crew rules within the group (Many were in the opposite camp). That being said, that means that the group header should not have any influence on the crew role. We cannot pick and choose what parts of the company header influences the crew roles, it is either it does or it doesn't. I don't think it does, so I don't think they should be credited. Quote:
Also use Group dividers for crew teams, included only if the crew meets the other listing requirements.
The above clarification in the divider section also tells me that the divider should only be entered if the crew meets the requirements. Which is a proper role, the ability to even create the company divider is dependent on the crew roles within the company credits. So in the way I see it the company group divider can have no influence on the crew within it, since the existence of the divider depends the crew being in appropriate roles. So the credited roles must stand on their own in order for us to even group them. So in this case since the roles of these example do not stand on their own on the crew chart we cannot add the company group divider and therefore the crew within it cannot inherit the company divider attributes. A "Chicken and the egg" scenario. | | | Last edited: by Scooter1836 |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,852 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Scooter1836: Quote: the way I see it the company group divider can have no influence on the crew within it, since the existence of the divider depends the crew being in appropriate roles. Correct! --------------- |
|