|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->General: General Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4 5 ...12 Previous Next
|
Gas Prices in U.S. Hit Record High...again |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: April 8, 2007 | Posts: 1,057 |
| Posted: | | | | Hi Guys,
Welcome back "Rifter" long time no post.
Tree hugging environmental wacko's are necessary, so are there opposite people. It insures that mostly middle ground is chosen, and the left or the right does not become too dominant. The cheapest oil will be used first. Remember plenty of oil is/was available, in Alberta's tar sands. However it was not economical, to harvest till, oil prices were well north of $50 per barrel.
Yes ethanol quotas are raising prices on all food items. Poor strategy government intervening in free markets. Free public transportation, who pays? Way too many expenses involved with mass transportation to be free. Or it could be free, but your taxes would go up, for the offset.
Want to save money & help free us from foreign oil try.
1. Slow down. Don't exceed the speed limit. 2. Check your tires, monthly 3. Get a yearly tune up 4. Combine trips 5. Purchase more fuel efficient autos 6. etc etc.
Take Care Rico | | | If I felt any better I'd be sick! Envy is mental theft. If you covet another mans possessions, then you should be willing to take on his responsibilities, heartaches, and troubles, along with his money. D. Koontz |
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,917 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting THEMADCHEF: Quote: replace all of your light bulbs, yeah they cost more in the beginning, but they last 10 years and use 70% less energy The best power-saving bulbs out there are LED bulbs. They use 1/30th the power of standard incandescents. They're not intended as a total replacement as their light is more directed, but can do well in many situations. http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/lights/7aa8/ |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,694 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting DavidTJorge: Quote: Rifter: you win the "let us destroy the world if we want, when we want!" prize. Congratulations. Oh, OK, time to blame the US for all that's wrong in the world. First, the US has led the way in creating technology to clean up the messes we ALL made environmentally before. Overall, the air and water in the US is cleaner than its been since the early 1900's. Latest figures show that the entire US only produces about 6% of the pollution the greenies are screaming about. Russia and China produce more than half between them. If the US had signed the Kyoto Accords (and thank god we didn't!) it would've ruined OUR economy while letting China, Russia, and all the other BIG polluters off the hook. I have no problems at all with keeping air and water clean, but destroying the strongest economy in the world to accomplish it is nothing but suicide for the entire world. The answer lies in continued research into things like hydrogen fuel that are virtually pollution free, but that takes research and it won't be cheap, and it will be the US that figures out how to make it work. That won't happen by forcing ill-conceived short term solutions on us or by restricting our ability to grow our economy to pay for it. By the way, gas prices are high for two reasons: First is speculators. We're seeing increases at the pump based on crude oils prices for oil that won't even be out of the ground for 3-6 months. Totally insane. Second, increased demand by India and China that cuts into the supply we used to purchase. Controlling speculators takes politicians with balls enough to really do something, and the increased demand requires that we build more new, modern up-to-date refineries and in the US at least, getting rid of all the boutique fuels that cause our refineries to shut down to change blends which creates spot shortages and runs up the price at the pump. (Rico made some good points in his post, too.) | | | John
"Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice!" Senator Barry Goldwater, 1964 Make America Great Again! |
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,917 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Rifter: Quote: Quoting DavidTJorge:
Quote: Rifter: you win the "let us destroy the world if we want, when we want!" prize. Congratulations. Oh, OK, time to blame the US for all that's wrong in the world. I don't think his post was targeting the US, I think it was targeting your post. |
| Registered: May 23, 2007 | Posts: 83 |
| Posted: | | | | it's nice to know how we got here, but i don't really care, we are trashing the planet, everybody is, but i don't want to give up the cool stuff i've got, like, cars, AC, DVD's, electricity, and hot pockets, so what are we going to do to save ourselves, we need solutions not finger pointing.
Are we doing our part? If everyone just did a little bit. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,380 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Rifter: Quote: it would've ruined OUR economy while letting China, Russia, and all the other BIG polluters off the hook. China and Russia have both signed and ratified the Kyoto protocol. US is the only country that is not intending to ratify it. Thankfully, what i've heard, many individual states in US are still trying to reach the goals. | | | Last edited: by whispering |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting whispering: Quote: Quoting Rifter:
Quote: it would've ruined OUR economy while letting China, Russia, and all the other BIG polluters off the hook. China and Russia have both signed and ratified the Kyoto protocol. US is the only country that is not intending to ratify it. China is held to a different standard than the US is. According to Wikipedia, China is building, on average, one coal-fired power plant every week, and plans to continue doing so for years. In 2004, their total greenhouse gas emissions were about 54% of US emissions. According to many sources, they surpassed US emissions in 2006 and are now number one in in CO2 emissions. Why wouldn't they sign it? It allowed them, in just two years, to become the number 1 polluter in the world. What a wonderful treaty that was. Quote: Thankfully, what i've heard, many individual states in US are still trying to reach the goals. Yes, many states are...and they didn't need some idiotic treaty to force them to do it. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar | | | Last edited: by TheMadMartian |
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Posts: 262 |
| Posted: | | | | I also think it bears pointing out that the European countries insisted on a beginning point for emission reductions under Kyoto that was (as I understand it) just before all of the dirty East German power plants were turned off and before Britain turned off their dirty coal plants. In this way they would get a head start on their emission "reductions" that were called for in the Kyoto treaty. That was a purely political calculation and certainly not in the best interests of actually reducing emissions. Plus from what I've read their C02 emissions have continued to rise anyway in recent years. Quote: Comparing total greenhouse gas emissions in 2004 to 1990 levels, the US emissions were up by 16%,[91] with irregular fluctuations from one year to another but a general trend to increase.[92] At the same time, the EU group of 23 (EU-23) Nations had reduced their emissions by 5%.[93] In addition, the EU-15 group of nations (a large subset of EU-23) reduced their emissions by 0.8% between 1990 and 2004, while emission rose 2.5% from 1999 to 2004. Part of the increases for some of the European Union countries are still in line with the treaty, being part of the cluster of countries implementation (see objectives in the list above).
As of year-end 2006, the United Kingdom and Sweden were the only EU countries on pace to meet their Kyoto emissions commitments by 2010. While UN statistics indicate that, as a group, the 36 Kyoto signatory countries can meet the 5% reduction target by 2012, most of the progress in greenhouse gas reduction has come from the stark decline in Eastern European countries' emissions after the fall of communism in the 1990s.[94] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_ProtocolSo a lot these "reductions" disappear (in Germany and the UK in particular) if you start in 1992 instead of 1990. Just another excuse to pile on the US for not signing this useless treaty. With China and India both up more than 40% from 1990 levels anty attempt by the west to make reductions will be a largely useless gesture. Let's admit this whole Kyoto thing is a joke (and a failure)! | | | Last edited: by bbursiek |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,380 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: Why wouldn't they sign it? It allowed them, in just two years, to become the number 1 polluter in the world. What a wonderful treaty that was. For china i have mixed feelings. They didnt cause the current situation and are only now starting to boom. So should we punish them for our mistakes, or let them do the same mistakes. Also if China just went ahead of US, that means its still 4 times smaller polluter then US counted per capita. Kyoto is the first step, these sorta things dont happen overnight, so delaing the first step would only backfire harder. Anyway they say it will cost to my country 1,2% of the GDP to reach the goals of 2012. Which is a lot. | | | Last edited: by whispering |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,692 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr. Killpatient: Quote: Quoting Rifter:
Quote: Quoting DavidTJorge:
Quote: Rifter: you win the "let us destroy the world if we want, when we want!" prize. Congratulations. Oh, OK, time to blame the US for all that's wrong in the world. I don't think his post was targeting the US, I think it was targeting your post. yes it was targeting his nutty post. | | | Paul |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting whispering: Quote: Quoting Unicus69:
Quote: Why wouldn't they sign it? It allowed them, in just two years, to become the number 1 polluter in the world. What a wonderful treaty that was. For china i have mixed feelings. They didnt cause the current situation and are only now starting to boom. So should we punish them for our mistakes, or let them do the same mistakes. Also if China just went ahead of US, that means its still 4 times smaller polluter then US counted per capita. If you are going to support a treaty that is designed to reduce CO2 emissions, then that is what it should do. There shouldn't be a loophole that allow some countries to increase them while forcing others to reduce. As an example, relative to 2005, China's fossil CO2 emissions increased in 2006 by 8.7%, while in the US, comparable CO2 emissions decreased in 2006 by 1.4%. As I said earlier, in 2004 China's emissions were about 54% of US emissions. In 2006, they were 8% higher than US emissions. At this rate, it won't matter what any other countries do. At best, the scales will simply balance and everything will remain the same. At worst, a bigger problem is created. I am sorry, but any treaty that allows this is a joke. If the goal is a reduction in CO2 emissions, then the proper course of action would be to teach countries, like China, how to do things the right way. Help them learn from the past. Allowing them to make the same exact 'mistakes' is just idiotic. Quote: Kyoto is the first step, these sorta things dont happen overnight, so delaing the first step would only backfire harder. I guess that depends on your point of view. From what I have seen, it is a huge joke...and not a very funny one. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Rifter: Quote: What makes this whole thing even worse, especially in the US, is that some of us were sounding the alarm about the damn tree-hugging, Bambi-loving, whacko environmentalists 30 years ago when the last refinery was built. That's why we don't just import crude oil, we also import refined gasoline.
There is more oil today that we know about in the ground than there was back when gas was only $.40 a gallon. We've got tankers sitting 5 deep off shore waiting to unload because there isn't enough storage capacity. Why? The tank farms can't accept more raw crude because there aren't enough refineries to process the stuff they've already got bunikered.
Then, for icing on the cake, we can't drill in the Arctic, off the coasts of California or Florida, despite the fact that there has never been a major spill incident. In addition, President Clinton fixed it so we can't mine the largest deposit of sweet coal in the world, which would provide us with 200 years worth of home grown energy, when he made the area into a wilderness preserve.
Liberals and liberalism will destroy this country (god help us if Obama is elected), and as we go, so goes the world. Very well said, John. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | I also agree with Unicus.
While the hand-wringers cry woe is me and we have to reduce pollkution. Ask yourselves because many of you are too young to remember. What was it like in the US, oh say 40 years ago, when we REAL:LY did have a pollution problem. Bot the air and water in the United States are a far cry from what it was in 1968...for the better.
This is the United States, we have been to the moon, given the challenge we can do anything, even moderate the alleged global warming.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,745 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: This is the United States, we have been to the moon, given the challenge we can do anything, even moderate the alleged global warming. Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall. | | | Karsten DVD Collectors Online
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting DJ Doena: Quote: Quoting skipnet50:
Quote: This is the United States, we have been to the moon, given the challenge we can do anything, even moderate the alleged global warming.
Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall. Very soon we'll see George W. at the shore commanding the tide not to come in... |
| Registered: April 16, 2007 | Posts: 39 |
| Posted: | | | | I've tuned and adjusted the Diesel engine of my Skoda. Today a can not only drive on Diesel but also on Vegitable oils. 1 liter of Sunflowerseed costs me 59 euro cents. A Liter diesel about 1,40 euro's So the choise was quickly made. And.... no CO2 emisions. The car drives fine even on a cold star. (in winter 30 liters of oil needs 10 liters of Diesel for a cold start. Anyway. Its cheaper and enviromentaly friendlier. |
|
|
Invelos Forums->General: General Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4 5 ...12 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|