|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1... 3 4 5 6 7 ...9 Previous Next
|
TV Series contributions - a definitive answer required |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Unlike Hal, who is busily TRYING to remove Boxset data despite the consensus, ooo I forgot he is hiding behind HIS interpretation of the Rules.
And exactly when was the last time you saw a contribution from me removing boxset contents, Skip. Talk about playing old tapes. I vote consistently against boxset contents being added to TV Sets because contrary to your statement that it is my INTERPRETATION of the Rules, anyone who understands the English language knows that the Rules specific state that single season TV Sets are NOT to be considered boxsets. You yourself agree that the cast, video and audio stuff should not be removed because they are not boxsets, yet on the other hand insist on adding boxset contents even though they are not boxsets. Talk about contradictory! | | | Hal | | | Last edited: by hal9g |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Twice in the last week, Hal. I voted No on both of them. One of them you even tried again
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | OK, I admit that this may have happpened in the frenzy of trying to populate the new database.
If so, it was UNINTENTIONAL as I thought I was only only submitting NEW profiles that were not yet in the database!
Given that, how long ago was it? | | | Hal | | | Last edited: by hal9g |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 278 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: OK, I admit that this may have happpened in the frenzy of trying to populate the new database.
If so, it was UNINTENTIONAL as I thought I was only only submitting NEW profiles that were not yet in the database!
Given that, how long ago was it? It doesn't matter. If you did do it then you were covered by the rules. | | | Guns don't kill people. Hammers do. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: OK, I admit that this may have happpened in the frenzy of trying to populate the new database.
If so, it was UNINTENTIONAL as I thought I was only only submitting NEW profiles that were not yet in the database!
Given that, how long ago was it? Ok Hal, my bad. A long time ago I certainly understand trying to populate, that said Hal, I support the Compromise and will not Vote No on your version of data, it would certainly be nice to see you likewise support the compromise, after all there is a consensus, thoug I will say I would like Ken to deal with it SOON. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 97 |
| Posted: | | | | Quote: Quoting skipnet50: thoug I will say I would like Ken to deal with it SOON.
Skip Indeed, a word from him or anyone else at invelos is what we really need. Surely they must be aware of the need for some kind of working solution for this problem. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Quoting hal9g:
Quote: OK, I admit that this may have happpened in the frenzy of trying to populate the new database.
If so, it was UNINTENTIONAL as I thought I was only only submitting NEW profiles that were not yet in the database!
Given that, how long ago was it?
Ok Hal, my bad. A long time ago I certainly understand trying to populate, that said Hal, I support the Compromise and will not Vote No on your version of data, it would certainly be nice to see you likewise support the compromise, after all there is a consensus, thoug I will say I would like Ken to deal with it SOON.
Skip As you well know, Skip, I have no problem with the creation and contribution of Child Profiles for TV Sets. I have even contributed some myself. My one and only beef with the "supposed" compromise is the addition of the child profiles to the parent profile as boxset contents. This is a blatant violation of the Current Rules and voting yes for that is also a violation of the Rules. I will not change my position on this until the Rules are changed or Ken makes a public statement authorizing this exception to the Rules. | | | Hal |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | This is where you and I part company, Hal. Not to be argumentative. Twice now the community has displayed a consensus on this, the SAME consensus. I am willing to recognize that as a compromise and go with it. In my view, you aren't interested in trying to resolve a problem, you want it your way or no way, and your way is the way YOU interpret the Rules. There is obviously no harm that is caused by the compromise, at least no that I have seen relative toi the Online it seems to handle the data quite nicely. You need to learn a bit about the art of Compromise, it is not the way I think it should be and the way I believe it will be ultimately, but it gets us a step closer.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | And don't try to hide behind the Rules, because frankly, my friend I don't believe you.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: And don't try to hide behind the Rules, because frankly, my friend I don't believe you.
Skip Who's hiding? The Rules are very clear when it comes to the "rare" cases where boxsets can be used for TV Sets. There is no interpretation involved. It is written in plain English! The "user" community does not have the authority to over-ride the Rules that have been published by Invelos, I don't care how many people are "for it". And you don't have the authority either, Skip! | | | Hal |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | As I said in my view, Hal, you have an agenda of your own.<sigh> It has to be your way or the highway, compromise is not part of your vocabulary, even when the obvious evidence screams the contrary at you.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: As I said in my view, Hal, you have an agenda of your own.<sigh> It has to be your way or the highway, compromise is not part of your vocabulary, even when the obvious evidence screams the contrary at you.
Skip And who's reading minds now, Skip? I repeat, neither the the user community nor you have the authority to implement any compromise that over-rides Invelos' published Rules. | | | Hal |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 844 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote:
And who's reading minds now, Skip? I Am! You are holding the.....7 of clubs!
I'm right, aren't I? I totally rock.HEY! that was NOT a nice thought! And it just so happens my mother is a teacher and my parents were married more than a year before I was born, thank you very much.l ast time I read your mind, that's for sure grumble grumble...try to provide a little levity and what does it get you...@#$% on, that's what | | | Last edited: by bob9000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | LOL, not from me, Bob.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | I have to go get the hermetically sealed mayonnaise jar from the front stoop of Funk & Wagnall's. O h great Karnak. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 404 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: As I said in my view, Hal, you have an agenda of your own.<sigh> It has to be your way or the highway, compromise is not part of your vocabulary, even when the obvious evidence screams the contrary at you.
Skip This is unbelieveable. If anyone here is unwilling to compromise, it's you Skip. It's only a discussion if everyone agrees with you. Really, what colour is the sky in YOUR world? And the worst part is that you actually believe what you are saying. Very scary. | | | The Other DVD Forum Why do people who know the least know it the loudest? |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1... 3 4 5 6 7 ...9 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|