SORT_NAME, the one that doesn't change, is the Sort Title from the online db...?

If that is so, I guess it would be the "request" to switch from SORT_NAME to LOC_SORT_NAME to be used in the filter function....?

Touti, ya_shin - are either of you guys able to look at the title information for Astrakan's Diamonds are Forever profile?
I've checked the profile and he's right - it doesn't matter what you do to the title information (all 3 fields), pressing "J" still takes you to that profile - so obviously there's something in there that's not changing.
It would be interesting to know what the SORT_NAME field contains - the one we aren't able to change.

So if I'm interpreting this right - when the profile was first created, it had a sort title of "James Bond 07", but now that the sort title is a local field only, we can't upload an amendment, so we're pretty much screwed? 

Sounds like this is less of a feature request and more of a bug report to me.

Quoting Touti:

Quote:
Quoting Rifter:

Quote:
If you look at your field names, you'll see that LOC_SORT_NAME corresponds to 'Sort Title' in your LOCAL database, and it is only used if you make an entry there.  Otherwise, it defaults to the same as the NAME field - the 'Title' field.  The SORT_NAME, unless I miss my guess, is used by the online to sort your uploaded files, and corresponds to the original entered title.

The search function, as you surmise, does NOT utilize the 'Sort Title' field.  Ex:  I have the three Matrix movies plus Animatrix, listed as 'Matrix 0' through 'Matrix 3' in my database.  A search using Matrix brings up the three movies that have Matrix in the actual title.  If I add the number, ie. 'Matrix 2', all the thumbnails for the three movies disappear, and it finds nothing.  Tried the same thing with several other sequences like that all with the same result.

Isn't that exactly what I wrote ?

Hey, it was worth saying twice!