|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Desktop Feature Requests |
Page:
1 2 3 Previous Next
|
Additional aspect ratios |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
| Erik | It's a strange world. |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 422 |
| Posted: | | | | First of all, also agree with the Blu-ray regions and HD audio requests below. But, I'd like to see a few more aspect ratio choices in the program, with HD discs becoming more "mainstream" (a bit anyway) there are some 'new' ratios I'd like to see incorporated. 2.40:1 (this one is used on a lot of current DVDs, HD DVDs, and Blu-rays.) 2.39:1 (used on a lot of Disney BD discs, and this is the 100% correct ratio that replaced 2.35 -- long story). 2.4:1 (used on all Warner Home Video HD DVDs and Blu-rays). 1.77:1 (used here and there, Lions Gate for instance). Thank you, don't want to "overwhelm" the program, but if I forgot any other commonly used ones, give them a mention below. | | | Erik
"Has it ever occurred to you, man, that given the nature of all this new stuff, that, uh, instead of running around blaming me, that this whole thing might just be, not, you know, not just such a simple, but uh - you know?" -- The Dude, The Big Lebowski
| | | Last edited: by Erik |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,774 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Erik: Quote:
2.40:1 (this one is used on a lot of current DVDs, HD DVDs, and Blu-rays.)
2.4:1 (used on all Warner Home Video HD DVDs and Blu-rays). These two are the same. And adding 2.40:1 makes sense, but I'm sure that adding 1.77:1 just adds confusion and is not really needed, as it is *very* close to 1.78:1. Same for 2.39:1, which would be very close to 2.40:1. |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,366 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Erik: Quote: 1.77:1 (used here and there, Lions Gate for instance). This one is just a chopped version of 1.777777777777 (16/9), which if properly rounded becomes 1.78 | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands |
| | Erik | It's a strange world. |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 422 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting SpaceFreakMicha: Quote: Quoting Erik:
Quote:
2.40:1 (this one is used on a lot of current DVDs, HD DVDs, and Blu-rays.)
2.4:1 (used on all Warner Home Video HD DVDs and Blu-rays). These two are the same.
And adding 2.40:1 makes sense, but I'm sure that adding 1.77:1 just adds confusion and is not really needed, as it is *very* close to 1.78:1. Same for 2.39:1, which would be very close to 2.40:1. They're all close/rounded up, agreed, but this is mainly to avoid manually typing them for each 2.40:1, 2.4:1, and 2.39:1 release which are increasing in numbers. At the very least 2.40:1 and 2.4:1 should be added due to their frequent use, IMO... | | | Erik
"Has it ever occurred to you, man, that given the nature of all this new stuff, that, uh, instead of running around blaming me, that this whole thing might just be, not, you know, not just such a simple, but uh - you know?" -- The Dude, The Big Lebowski
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,366 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Erik: Quote: At the very least 2.40:1 and 2.4:1 should be added due to their frequent use, IMO... Sorry, but I do not see the point to have both of these as they are not close but exactly the same. Just as 2.400:1, 2.4000:1 etc. are. For consistancy 2.40:1 would be enough. | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,680 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Erik: Quote: At the very least 2.40:1 and 2.4:1 should be added due to their frequent use, IMO... As SpaceFreakMicha pointed out, 2.4 and 2.40 is the same figure. [Edit]Martin beat me to it[/Edit] | | | My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users. Gunnar | | | Last edited: by GSyren |
| | Erik | It's a strange world. |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 422 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting GSyren: Quote: Quoting Erik:
Quote: At the very least 2.40:1 and 2.4:1 should be added due to their frequent use, IMO... As SpaceFreakMicha pointed out, 2.4 and 2.40 is the same figure.
[Edit]Martin beat me to it[/Edit] Do you guys own any HD discs? Yes they are the same, but 2.4:1 (rounded value) can be a bit tricky to type into the Aspect Ratio box in the program. And for db accuracy, all these ratios are used... Not just: "2.40, close enough to 2.4:1 or 2.39:1." | | | Erik
"Has it ever occurred to you, man, that given the nature of all this new stuff, that, uh, instead of running around blaming me, that this whole thing might just be, not, you know, not just such a simple, but uh - you know?" -- The Dude, The Big Lebowski
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | 2.4=2.40? Are we not qibbling over sematics here. The INDUSTRY uses 2.40...NOT 2.4...'nuff said.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 585 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: 2.4=2.40? Are we not qibbling over sematics here. The INDUSTRY uses 2.40...NOT 2.4...'nuff said.
Skip Guess you still haven't made the HD plunge yet? Many of the ones I've bothered to actually look for this (since I thought it was odd when I first noticed it) and several of the ones I own have 2.4:1 on the back. But as has already been pointed out.. tomato, to-mah-to.. it's all the same. Since this is an open field and we can type whatever we want into it, I'm not sure if it really matters what shows as available in the drop down box. I've always thought of it as kind of like the Edition field where the drop down has some of the most common examples, but if it's not in there then you just type in what it's supposed to be. | | | "Rules are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men" - Douglas Bader "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams |
| | Erik | It's a strange world. |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 422 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: 2.4=2.40? Are we not qibbling over sematics here. The INDUSTRY uses 2.40...NOT 2.4...'nuff said. The industry uses both, Skip. But as Vega said, it is an open field box, just thought these would be nice as defaults due to their frequent usage. 2.20 is there but not 2.40! | | | Erik
"Has it ever occurred to you, man, that given the nature of all this new stuff, that, uh, instead of running around blaming me, that this whole thing might just be, not, you know, not just such a simple, but uh - you know?" -- The Dude, The Big Lebowski
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Vega: Quote: Quoting skipnet50:
Quote: 2.4=2.40? Are we not qibbling over sematics here. The INDUSTRY uses 2.40...NOT 2.4...'nuff said.
Skip
Guess you still haven't made the HD plunge yet? Many of the ones I've bothered to actually look for this (since I thought it was odd when I first noticed it) and several of the ones I own have 2.4:1 on the back. But as has already been pointed out.. tomato, to-mah-to.. it's all the same.
Since this is an open field and we can type whatever we want into it, I'm not sure if it really matters what shows as available in the drop down box. I've always thought of it as kind of like the Edition field where the drop down has some of the most common examples, but if it's not in there then you just type in what it's supposed to be. As Arte used to say, Verrrrrry interesting. I have preceisely TWO HD/DVD Combos, one of which is not applicable, the other one I just picked up this morning and looked at the back...pardon my french...damn 2.4:1, Have I told you lately how much I HATE Hollywood. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 1,777 |
| Posted: | | | | I honestly can't tell when people are joking when it comes to the internet. Somebody actually wants 2.4 as a dropdown when 2.40 already exists?? That's like some horribly geeky math pun or something. |
| | Erik | It's a strange world. |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 422 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting mdnitoil: Quote: I honestly can't tell when people are joking when it comes to the internet. Somebody actually wants 2.4 as a dropdown when 2.40 already exists?? It doesn't, nice try though. And some people take this place (too, arguably) seriously, but feel free to be 'cool' and 'above' all that with such memorable quips as "horribly geeky math pun." You may now resume your Power Rangers viewing. | | | Erik
"Has it ever occurred to you, man, that given the nature of all this new stuff, that, uh, instead of running around blaming me, that this whole thing might just be, not, you know, not just such a simple, but uh - you know?" -- The Dude, The Big Lebowski
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 1,777 |
| Posted: | | | | Doh, thought 2.40 was already there. If it's not then the whole thing is rather moot. That being said, having them both in the list would be the mathematical definition of redundant, Power Rangers notwithstanding. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,321 |
| Posted: | | | | I agree that there's no point in having both listed. I don't care how the packaging lists the aspect ratio, 2.40:1 is still equal to 2.4:1. I honestly don't understand why we would want both listed. In fact, I'm happy to just type in values. | | | Get the CSVExport and Database Query plug-ins here. Create fake parent profiles to organize your collection. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,774 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Mark Harrison: Quote: I agree that there's no point in having both listed. I don't care how the packaging lists the aspect ratio, 2.40:1 is still equal to 2.4:1. I honestly don't understand why we would want both listed. In fact, I'm happy to just type in values. Agree. |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Desktop Feature Requests |
Page:
1 2 3 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|