Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3  Previous   Next
Non Standard Aspect Ratio
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorCharlieM
Registered Sept 5 2005
Registered: May 20, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 2,934
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting rdodolak:
Quote:
Quoting The Movieman:
Quote:
So this has cropped up (so to speak). There's a submission changing the aspect ratio from 2.35 to 2.36. Has there been an official ruling on this from Ken? I find these minuscule changes to be unnecessary but not sure what kind of consensus there was (if any).


This is in regards to one of my submissions (Session 9 Blu-ray).  I realize people may have different opinions but the way I viewed it, accurate information should be submitted; not pseudo-accurate information.  I don't see how this is any different than anything else we contribute such as replicating typos in the overview and cast/crew or the DVD title which may be different from the actual film title.


I agree, accuracy is always desired.  going from 2.35 to 2.36 is minuscule indeed.  As MediaDog said, how can you be sure that the codecs and the hardware are not causing the difference.  if I measured it on my system, would I get 2.34 instead.  Would Movieman actually measure 2.35.

I would say that this is within the "margin of error".
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorrdodolak
Registered: March 18, 2007
Reputation: Superior Rating
United States Posts: 1,639
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting CharlieM:
Quote:
I agree, accuracy is always desired.  going from 2.35 to 2.36 is minuscule indeed.  As MediaDog said, how can you be sure that the codecs and the hardware are not causing the difference.  if I measured it on my system, would I get 2.34 instead.  Would Movieman actually measure 2.35.

I would say that this is within the "margin of error".


Yes, if someone else measures it correctly it would be the same.  This was measured from the individual frames that were taken directly from the disc which is independent from any differences in codecs/hardware.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorCharlieM
Registered Sept 5 2005
Registered: May 20, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 2,934
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting rdodolak:
Quote:
Quoting CharlieM:
Quote:
I agree, accuracy is always desired.  going from 2.35 to 2.36 is minuscule indeed.  As MediaDog said, how can you be sure that the codecs and the hardware are not causing the difference.  if I measured it on my system, would I get 2.34 instead.  Would Movieman actually measure 2.35.

I would say that this is within the "margin of error".


Yes, if someone else measures it correctly it would be the same.  This was measured from the individual frames that were taken directly from the disc which is independent from any differences in codecs/hardware.



There is still hardware and software involved.  Everything from the BD.DVD palyer to the graphics processor, to the monitor.  Including the software that pulled the image from the drive.  To much to instill errors.

I will trust that you are confident about your measurements.  They very well may be accurate.  I still say that they are  awful close, and we should err on the side of caution...
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,736
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting rdodolak:
Quote:
There's a submission changing the aspect ratio from 2.35 to 2.36.

I still feel the way I felt back when we talked about this seven years ago: I'd keep it at 2.35:1.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorGSyren
Profiling since 2001
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Sweden Posts: 4,684
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I have found that when I measure the aspect ratio on PowerDVD, I get different values in normal mode and in fullscreen mode. It's a very small difference, but still it indicates to me that it's iffy to trust these measurements blindly.
My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorbbbbb
on steroids
Registered: March 14, 2007
Posts: 5,734
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting The Movieman:
Quote:
There's a submission changing the aspect ratio from 2.35 to 2.36.

Ridiculous.
Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect]
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorNexus the Sixth
Contributor since 2002
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Sweden Posts: 3,197
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
I have found that when I measure the aspect ratio on PowerDVD, I get different values in normal mode and in fullscreen mode. It's a very small difference, but still it indicates to me that it's iffy to trust these measurements blindly.


Of course. As soon as any kind of scaling is involved you can't trust the result. You need to perform the measurement on a 1:1 pixel frame. But even then I wouldn't trust anyone who claims they can measure to an accuracy of .01. Too much room for error imo. Especially since you could have variations between individual frames especially for films made in the pre-digital era as a result of the telecine process.
First registered: February 15, 2002
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorGSyren
Profiling since 2001
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Sweden Posts: 4,684
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting iPatsa:
Quote:
But even then I wouldn't trust anyone who claims they can measure to an accuracy of .01. Too much room for error imo.
Agreed.
My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorGSyren
Profiling since 2001
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Sweden Posts: 4,684
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I just noticed that the AR for Mysterious Island (811956-020925) has been changed from 1.66:1 to 1.67:1. In all fairness, I checked it myself with AspectGuide on PowerDVD 13 and I did get 1.67:1 in 3 different screen sizes. Two of those tests were done using Auto Resize, which measures down to pixel level. But I'm still leery about such a minute change.
My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar
 Last edited: by GSyren
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorwidescreenforever
Under A Double DoubleW
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Canada Posts: 5,494
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
as far as I am concerned (  IMO) the chart should read as follows:

1:19:1 /1.25:1 /1.33:1 /1.37:1 / 1.66:1 / 1.75:1 / 1.85:1 / 1.90:1 / 2.00:1 / 2.20:1 / 2.30:1 / 2.35:1 /2.40:1 /2.55:1 /2.59:1 / 2.76:1 / 2.89:1

first would be the early type "pre Chaplin films " ,
the last would be smilebox ..

did I miss any    ?
In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.

Terry
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorAiAustria
Profiling since 2004
Registered: May 19, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Austria Posts: 5,715
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
... only less important

1,78:1
Complete list of Common Names  •  A good point for starting with Headshots (and v11.1)
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorrdodolak
Registered: March 18, 2007
Reputation: Superior Rating
United States Posts: 1,639
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting iPatsa:
Quote:
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
I have found that when I measure the aspect ratio on PowerDVD, I get different values in normal mode and in fullscreen mode. It's a very small difference, but still it indicates to me that it's iffy to trust these measurements blindly.


Of course. As soon as any kind of scaling is involved you can't trust the result. You need to perform the measurement on a 1:1 pixel frame. But even then I wouldn't trust anyone who claims they can measure to an accuracy of .01. Too much room for error imo. Especially since you could have variations between individual frames especially for films made in the pre-digital era as a result of the telecine process.


Unless you measure the frames which have been extracted 1:1 and haven't been manipulated (i.e. stretched, squished, etc.).  Blu-rays have are native 1920x1080 pixels so anything more or less has been altered.  As along as the frame is the original 1920x1080 pixels the measurement is good, unless one believes the black bars or picture area was manipulated prior to measurement.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorscotthm
Registered: March 20, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 2,851
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
I just noticed that the AR for Mysterious Island (811956-020925) has been changed from 1.66:1 to 1.67:1. In all fairness, I checked it myself with AspectGuide on PowerDVD 13 and I did get 1.67:1 in 3 different screen sizes. Two of those tests were done using Auto Resize, which measures down to pixel level. But I'm still leery about such a minute change.

If you can't tell the difference without a measuring tool then it's a difference not worth noting IMO.

---------------
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorrdodolak
Registered: March 18, 2007
Reputation: Superior Rating
United States Posts: 1,639
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
One way to please everyone is for the program to allow us to contribute the more accurate data as we do today but also provide the option to those that want their local database to round to the closest fixed aspect ratio when displayed.  Seems like that would be a win-win situation.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorNexus the Sixth
Contributor since 2002
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Sweden Posts: 3,197
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting widescreenforever:
Quote:
as far as I am concerned (  IMO) the chart should read as follows:

1:19:1 /1.25:1 /1.33:1 /1.37:1 / 1.66:1 / 1.75:1 / 1.85:1 / 1.90:1 / 2.00:1 / 2.20:1 / 2.30:1 / 2.35:1 /2.40:1 /2.55:1 /2.59:1 / 2.76:1 / 2.89:1

first would be the early type "pre Chaplin films " ,
the last would be smilebox ..

did I miss any    ?


1.55:1

Otherwise you pretty much covered the Wikipedia list.
First registered: February 15, 2002
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorwidescreenforever
Under A Double DoubleW
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Canada Posts: 5,494
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting AiAustria:
Quote:
... only less important

1,78:1


    your're right .. !  I was thinking along lines of theatrical films ..  But yes there are some made for TV DVD releases at 1.78:1  and more importantly the 1.85 and 1.75 films are issued in 1.78
In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.

Terry
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3  Previous   Next