Author |
Message |
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting samuelrichardscott: Quote: I want to join the rules committee, but I would end up just asking myself how I am supposed to soar like an eagle when I'm flying with turkeys. Sit and meditate with your cat for a while, and then you can soar with the angels. --------------- |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,197 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Flåklypa: Quote: Why not use "Sentence case".
Quote: In most newspapers in the U.S. (and in virtually all publications in the U.K.), sentence case (also known as down style) is the standard form for headlines.
Sentense case
This is the standard form for titles and headlines in most countries. The rule will be simple and easy to understand and it will be consistent for most languages. But we're dealing with Titles here, so Title Case seems like a better fit. | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
Registered: March 23, 2011 | Posts: 462 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | Last edited: by No-way |
|
Registered: December 27, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,131 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: Quoting DoubleDownAgain:
Quote: Why do I care? Because when I purchase a new DVD or blu-ray, and add it to my collection, I am hoping that the downloaded information will be correct, and I won't have to take the time to have to "fix it" to the correct title. "Correct" is whatever the rules say is correct. If it's been entered according to the rules it is correct.
--------------- I would like to give a Motion of no confidence, pertaining to contribution rules committee, and to scotthm. I think you should remove yourself from the discussions on rules immediately. |
|
Registered: March 18, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,640 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting ateo357: Quote: I would like to give a Motion of no confidence, pertaining to contribution rules committee, and to scotthm. I think you should remove yourself from the discussions on rules immediately. I second this motion. There's also a change submitted to change As Good As It Gets to As Good as It Gets. This is in line with the current revised rules but this title has always been As Good As It Gets. Even on the cover the first letter of each word is larger then the rest implying the first letter is uppercase while the rest are lower case. The rules are flawed at best. |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting rdodolak: Quote: The rules are flawed at best. The were written by a committee of mortals. What do you expect? --------------- |
|
Registered: March 18, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,640 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: Quoting rdodolak:
Quote: The rules are flawed at best. The were written by a committee of mortals. What do you expect?
--------------- A committee that likes to agree to disagree. |
|
Registered: December 27, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,131 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: Quoting rdodolak:
Quote: The rules are flawed at best. The were written by a committee of mortals. What do you expect?
--------------- If it was my program. I would first invite people who contribute on a regular basis, and have a first hand experience of using the vague, outdated rules. Forum trolls and the occasional contributor would not be seated in the committee. No volunteers, they usually have a personal agenda. Once the committee has finished with their draft of the rules, I would have another committee go over that draft and then send it back to the first for revisions. Then make it public for input. |
|
Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,018 |
| Posted: | | | | Fine, but then I would have less experienced contributors on your second committee, since very experienced contributors are not always able to empathize with novices. The rules should be clear to everyone, not just to those who practically know them by heart anyway. | | | Last edited: by dee1959jay |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting ateo357: Quote: If it was my program.... All you have to do is buy Invelos from Ken and your fantasy can come true. --------------- |
|
Registered: December 27, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,131 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote: Quoting ateo357:
Quote: If it was my program.... All you have to do is buy Invelos from Ken and your fantasy can come true.
--------------- thought about it. But don't like dealing with people. Went with land purchases instead. |
|
Registered: December 27, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,131 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting dee1959jay: Quote: Fine, but then I would have less experienced contributors on your second committee, since very experienced contributors are not always able to empathize with novices. The rules should be clear to everyone, not just to those who practically know them by heart anyway. and who asks the most questions now - the new contributors. |
|
Registered: May 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,475 |
| Posted: | | | | The very first sentence in the rules, pertaining to Titles, is "Use the title from the front cover." Capitalization rules do not alter that fact.
Changes that apply the capitalization rules, while ignoring the basic Title rule, are incorrect and should be declined. |
|
Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,018 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting ateo357: Quote: Quoting dee1959jay:
Quote: Fine, but then I would have less experienced contributors on your second committee, since very experienced contributors are not always able to empathize with novices. The rules should be clear to everyone, not just to those who practically know them by heart anyway.
and who asks the most questions now - the new contributors. Which proves my point. |
|
Registered: December 27, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,131 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting dee1959jay: Quote: Quoting ateo357:
Quote: Quoting dee1959jay:
Quote: Fine, but then I would have less experienced contributors on your second committee, since very experienced contributors are not always able to empathize with novices. The rules should be clear to everyone, not just to those who practically know them by heart anyway.
and who asks the most questions now - the new contributors.
Which proves my point. you are missing my point. once it leaves the 1st. Is gone over by the 2nd, sent back to the 1st with suggested changes (so everyone can understand them - reason for the 2nd committee). |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Kathy: Quote: The very first sentence in the rules, pertaining to Titles, is "Use the title from the front cover." Capitalization rules do not alter that fact.
Changes that apply the capitalization rules, while ignoring the basic Title rule, are incorrect and should be declined. I'm not sure exactly what you are saying here. The "first rule","Use the title from the front cover", is there to prevent people from using the title from the film's credits, the spine, the credit block, IMDB or any other source. It has nothing to do with capitalization, which is spelled out further down in the section. | | | Hal |
|