 |
|
|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4  Previous Next
|
|
Special edition crew, 2nd unit crew etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
  | Berak | | Bibamus morieundum est! |
| Registered: May 10, 2007 |  Posts: 1,059 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting pompel9: Quote:
Quoting Berak:
Quote:
As I have allready explained to you morron, is that this is not my profile. I loaded it from IVS an did nothing to it since. If I am not mistaken I actually think you submitted this profile on IVS. So before you try to shoot at others, look to yourself first. But since you now have pointed out that it is full of errors, I will personaly do an audit myself. But I am not going to contribute it. I am fed up. I will not contibute anymore.
And don't come here with total cowpie. It was you who attacked me in a private message. I won't say what you said, because it's not suited on this forum. You come and attack me and then you try to push the blame on me. Well, I will not drop down to your level. First of all - what's a 'morron'?!   Second - you haven't explained me jack shiitake mushroom - you have only tried to invoke your interpretation of the rules... (an English Dictionary might be a good idea for you to wish for Christmas).  Examples: Cross of Iron (I rearranged the Genres so that War was on top - and that was a SMALL portion of my contribution as yours was evidently copied from IMDB - as are all your contributions). Smokey and the Bandit collection (you submitted the Overview with the tagline as well as LOADS of typos and got pissed when I voted no). Battle Creek Brawl (you vote no when I removed the Chinese "original" title on the basis that this is a Hong Kong production when in fact it is the first JC film produced in the US - by Warner Bros.). The list goes on and on and on and on and on and on and on.... And the evident fact that your knowledge of the English language is that of a two-year old doesn't help.... Oh - and please feel free to publish any of my PM's - I have nothing to hide. You on the other hand trying to give me discredit by comparing me to Skip - hell, I take that as a compliment any day - especially coming from you..  And for the record; the profile you insist on is from IVS (and contributed by me) did not come from me - I have NEVER used IMDB as a source for my contributions.... | | | Berak
It's better to burn out than to fade away!
True love conquers all! | | | | Last edited: by Berak |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 3,480 |
| | Posted: | | | | Is this a remake? The script seems familiar...but the actors are different.  | | | ...James
"People fake a lot of human interactions, but I feel like I fake them all, and I fake them very well. That’s my burden, I guess." ~ Dexter Morgan |
| | Berak | | Bibamus morieundum est! |
| Registered: May 10, 2007 | | Posts: 1,059 |
| | Posted: | | | | | | | Berak
It's better to burn out than to fade away!
True love conquers all! |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | What...only 3 pages! That's pitiful!  | | | | Hal |
| | Berak | | Bibamus morieundum est! |
| Registered: May 10, 2007 | | Posts: 1,059 |
| | Posted: | | | | | | | Berak
It's better to burn out than to fade away!
True love conquers all! |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 13,199 |
| | Posted: | | | | Bottom line, and in hopes of getting back on topic, 'unit crew' is not prohibited by the rules and it never has been. As I said, this is, and always has been, a phantom rule that was created by users in the forums. They took the specific unit crew prohibitions and turned them into a blanket statement of 'no unit crew'. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 3,188 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote:
If you can't engage in civil discourse without getting nasty and insulting, don't bother.
Skip I may have to put that in my signature. | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 467 |
| | | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 467 |
| | Posted: | | | | Why do I even bother. You guys are just a load of crap. You are not interrested in the best of the DVDProfiler community. You just look for excuses to deal out insults. Well, I hope Ken and Gerri ban you all from posting here. |
| | Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 1,777 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Patsa: Quote:
Quoting skipnet50:
Quote:
If you can't engage in civil discourse without getting nasty and insulting, don't bother.
Skip
I may have to put that in my signature. I was kind of worried that he might have got hit by lightning after typing it.  | | | | Last edited: by mdnitoil |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | I have said this before and I expect I will say it agian. I don't like to fight (as opposed to a debate), my favorite thing in life is laughter. Ocassionally, I do get annoyed and will engage, but pompel and please don't take thgis personally or as an insult, I have not seen anything in you actions and behavior that backs up your claim about wanting what is bets for profiler. Your idea of what is best seems to be to look for loopholes that can be exploited and then to get snippy if you get an answer that is NOT the one that you want. We are ALL human and we are all ocassionally guilty of some of this, myself included. But your attack on Berak was totally uncalled for, he did not say anything that I saw that was deserving of that response from you. IF the two of you had a PM disagrement, that anger needs to stay in the PM environment.
As I have also said numerous times, I consider all you to be my friends despite the treatment that some choose to visit upon me. That said, I will as I did in this case, defend you just as quickly as I did berak, if a user launches such an attack upon you.
Peace, guys. You might find me to be not so bad if you really made an attempt to understand where I am coming from.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote:
Bottom line, and in hopes of getting back on topic, 'unit crew' is not prohibited by the rules and it never has been. As I said, this is, and always has been, a phantom rule that was created by users in the forums. They took the specific unit crew prohibitions and turned them into a blanket statement of 'no unit crew'. Totally irrelevant, Unicus. We have numerous ways of doing things that fall outside the specific scope of therules, but falls within the general concept of them . See the recent thread on Production Notes as an example. The Awards are not covered per se within the Rules but there is a small so far, but decisive consensus on how to deal with it. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
| | Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote:
Bottom line, and in hopes of getting back on topic, 'unit crew' is not prohibited by the rules and it never has been. As I said, this is, and always has been, a phantom rule that was created by users in the forums. They took the specific unit crew prohibitions and turned them into a blanket statement of 'no unit crew'. Good point, but I've just looked at the prohibitions and to be honest, the only crew who aren't specifically prohibited are the sound crew! It does seem very odd to allow unit sound crew, but no one else, and does seem to make more sense to say "no unit crew". But just to be clear, I don't class special edition crew as unit crew, I believe that if special edition crew are credited, then we can credit them using dividers. |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,635 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote:
Bottom line, and in hopes of getting back on topic, 'unit crew' is not prohibited by the rules and it never has been. As I said, this is, and always has been, a phantom rule that was created by users in the forums. They took the specific unit crew prohibitions and turned them into a blanket statement of 'no unit crew'. Well it may be an urban legend, but it's one that has been followed for a long time, and I don't see any reason to change it at this point. If you're suggesting that we just need to actually document it in the Rules, I agree. | | | | Hal |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,199 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote:
Quoting Unicus69:
Quote:
Bottom line, and in hopes of getting back on topic, 'unit crew' is not prohibited by the rules and it never has been. As I said, this is, and always has been, a phantom rule that was created by users in the forums. They took the specific unit crew prohibitions and turned them into a blanket statement of 'no unit crew'.
Totally irrelevant, Unicus. We have numerous ways of doing things that fall outside the specific scope of therules, but falls within the general concept of them . See the recent thread on Production Notes as an example. The Awards are not covered per se within the Rules but there is a small so far, but decisive consensus on how to deal with it.
Skip Sorry, but it is 100% relevant for someone who supports the rules...as you claim to do. A 'no' vote on the submission of unit crew is not allowed because such a submission doesn't violate the rules. Spin it any way you want but you can't argue that fact.  | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,199 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote:
Quoting Unicus69:
Quote:
Bottom line, and in hopes of getting back on topic, 'unit crew' is not prohibited by the rules and it never has been. As I said, this is, and always has been, a phantom rule that was created by users in the forums. They took the specific unit crew prohibitions and turned them into a blanket statement of 'no unit crew'.
Well it may be an urban legend, but it's one that has been followed for a long time, and I don't see any reason to change it at this point.
If you're suggesting that we just need to actually document it in the Rules, I agree. If that is a position we want to support, and I honestly don't care either way, then, yes, it needs to be put into the rules. As it sits right now there is a HUGE hole in the rules on that particular issue. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |