Mary in the second season of ROME is JULIENNE Liberto and not JuliANNE ! Check the IMDb site for Julienne Liberto, she's awesome!!! Really pretty and such a cool resume!!!!

This should solve the whole thing:

http://www.julienneliberto.com/

The "credit lookup tool" shows one title for Julienne Liberto ('Heaven'), and one for Julianne Liberto (the second season of 'Rome'). Her official site lists both credits, so we know it's indeed the same person. With two different credits, it's impossible to declare what is the "most-credited form", so I think we can use her official site as the tiebreaker - since that's her name, chances are she'll be credited as such in future projects as well. So I'd say she should be entered as "Julienne Liberto [Julianne Liberto]" in 'Rome'.

Quoting T!M:

Quote:
Quoting 8ballMax:

Quote:
That's great, but we don't use IMDb when it comes to film credits. If she is credited as Julianne Liberto in the credits, then that's how she gets credited. Otherwise, I don't get the point of this post .

Oh, and for the record: I actually quite like these new resumé's at imdb.com (here's Ms. Liberto's example) - they're not just normal user-built data, but it's actually an optional extra that has to be paid for, and the information has to be supplied to IMDb by some kind of agent. As such, the data listed on these resumé's often contradicts IMDb's own data, and I've found them to be quote reliable for establishing whether it's indeed that particular actor/actress who starred in that partical movie/tv show, or someone else with the same or a similar name. The difference is clear here, too: while IMDb itself has a separate, incorrect entry for the non-existing "Julianna Liberto", the resumé for "Julienne" actually includes the "Julianna" credit. Since these resumé's contain paid-for, agent-supplied data, they're quite a bit more reliable than the "normal", user-built data.

Ummm...I don't think it has to be supplied by any type of agent. From what I understand, this info could have come from anyone with and IMDb Pro Account. BTW, here is IMDb's disclaimer at the end of this resume:

"IMDb is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this page, which have been supplied by a third party and have not been screened or verified."

I got that. Still, I figured that it wouldn't hurt to point out the obvious - there are just too many people here who'd happily enter her as "Julianne Liberto" in 'Rome' without applying the much-needed common name - even IMDb made that mistake. Now, wouldn't we all like to rise above their level? 

@ 8ballMax: granted. But still: it does have to be paid for, which IMHO makes it a little bit more trustworthy than "normal" IMDb-data. And looking at the resumé-page for Ms. Liberto, it's clear that the information there does come from someone very directly associated to her - there's an abundance of very private (a bit too private, if you ask me) information there. All I meant to say was that I value the information in such resumé's a little more than the general, user-built IMDb-data. The fact that it often contradicts IMDb's own data, like it does here, doesn't hurt either. 

Quoting T!M:

Quote:
I got that. Still, I figured that it wouldn't hurt to point out the obvious - there are just too many people here who'd happily enter her as "Julianne Liberto" in 'Rome' without applying the much-needed common name - even IMDb made that mistake. Now, wouldn't we all like to rise above their level? 

Point taken. I agree that there are far, far too many users relying on IMDb for cast & crew credits, the appalling condition of the CLT makes this quite evident.

Whoa.....according to her IMDB Resume she's 39 kg (i.e., about 86 pounds?)  That's one tiny woman!