| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 4,245 |
| | Posted: | | | | I need to confirm if there are at least 2 actors with the name Riley Smith in the database. The first was born in 1978. 1978 The other has only one credit for The Eye of the Storm which is listed in the CLT for UPC#9-324915-086159 UnknownSo can anyone confirm that the Riley Smith in The Eye of the Storm is a baby. Assuming that a Macrory Baby is actually a baby. Thanks. |
|
| Registered: November 24, 2008 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 1,289 |
| | Posted: | | | | If he was born in 1978 and the baby is a baby in 2011 (which seems likely) it's got to be a different actor. | | | | Last edited: by GreyHulk |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 4,245 |
| | Posted: | | | | Well, I've learned to never take anything for granted.
His name is listed under a group divider "Macrory Baby". I'm assuming it's a baby, but Macrory Baby could be a band or rock group too. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 1,440 |
| | Posted: | | | | From the cast list for that profile:
Peter Houghton as Rory Macrory
Trudy Hellier as Anne Macrory
Monique Heath as Mags Macrory
Macrory Boys
Charlie Dean
William Fisher
Lachlan Thompson
Macrory Baby
Riley Smith
Darcy Smith
While not absolute, this would usually indicate that yes, the role is a baby. | | | | Registered: February 10, 2002 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 13,202 |
| | Posted: | | | | I agree with greyghost, it seems like the role is that of a baby. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar |
|
| Registered: June 1, 2013 |  Posts: 217 |
| | Posted: | | | | "Macrory Baby could be a band or rock group too."
Not a band/rock group...it is a baby. |
|
| Registered: June 21, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 2,621 |
| | Posted: | | | | It certainly looks and reads like a role of "a baby", but it should be visually confirmed just in case it is something else. Or is that what you are saying, that you know for fact it is the role of a baby, JMGuer? There's a "Baby" role in Devil's Rejects which isn't a small child.  |
|
| Registered: June 1, 2013 | | Posts: 217 |
| | Posted: | | | | that you know for fact it is the role of a baby, JMGuer?
^
(seen the movie)
edit
but it should be visually confirmed just in case it is something else
by all means....get the DVD....pretty good flick
There's a "Baby" role in Devil's Rejects which isn't a small child.
yes, and neither was Bette Davis as Baby Jane Hudson | | | | Last edited: by JMGuer |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 6,730 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting JMGuer: Quote:
yes, and neither was Bette Davis as Baby Jane Hudson Baby Houseman, possibly? | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
| Registered: June 1, 2013 | | Posts: 217 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Lewis_Prothero: Quote:
Quoting JMGuer:
Quote:
yes, and neither was Bette Davis as Baby Jane Hudson
Baby Houseman, possibly? Nah...Baby Houseman was more of a babe (not to suggest that Bette Davis, in her prime, wasn't) |
|